Stuart Broad has accused Pakistan batter Imam-ul-Haq of “putting on an act” after the left-hander missed the second Test against England at Lord’s because of a calf injury.

The controversy grew after Imam was seen practising with his injured leg taped. Pakistan were already one batter short, and his decision not to bat became a talking point.

Imam picked up a low-grade calf strain while fielding on the first day. He had also dropped two important catches. Pakistan’s medical team treated him before ruling him out for the rest of the Test.

Pakistan later lost the match by 194 runs. Imam did not bat in either innings.

However, Imam’s actions on Day 4 raised more questions. He was seen practising on the sidelines while wearing shorts. Tape was clearly visible around his left calf. He also appeared to limp during the session.

Reports later suggested that Imam could bat if Pakistan badly needed him.

Stuart Broad Questions Imam-ul-Haq’s Injury

Stuart Broad reacted strongly to the footage of Imam practising with his calf taped before the start of Day 4 of England vs Pakistan Lord’s Test 2026. 

The former England pacer felt Imam could have trained away from the public if he wanted to avoid attention.

“That’s all for show. He has got a bit of stick from the media and maybe his teammates,” Stuart Broad said on Sky Sports.

Broad also questioned why Imam chose to make his injury so visible.

“Whatever. You can do that inside the indoor school without anyone seeing, don’t have to come wearing shorts and tape and hobble around like that. I am not impressed with that. Sorry,” he added.

Broad’s comments do not prove that Imam’s injury was fake. Pakistan’s medical team had diagnosed him with a low-grade calf strain.

Broad’s criticism focused on Imam’s public practice session. He questioned whether Imam could have shown more desire to help Pakistan, especially when the team was already struggling.

Mohammad Wasim Had Made Similar Claims

Broad’s comments came at a sensitive time because former Pakistan batter and chief selector Mohammad Wasim had made similar claims about Imam in the past.

Wasim spoke about an incident from 2022. He said Pakistan’s physiotherapist had warned him about a possible issue involving Imam before the team made any official announcement.

“The physio had actually come to me and told me beforehand. The announcement hadn’t even been made yet, and the decision hadn’t even been made,” Wasim recalled during an online discussion with cricket historian Dr Nauman Niaz.

Wasim said events then happened as the physiotherapist had predicted. He also claimed that coaches had raised similar concerns before.

“And it happened exactly like that. Because of whatever discussions he’d had, he then said that this had happened in the past too, and coaches had complained about similar things,” Wasim said.

Wasim’s comments were allegations and were not proven facts. However, they have come back into focus after the Lord’s controversy.

Vikrant Gupta Also Questions Imam’s Commitment

Indian sports journalist Vikrant Gupta also questioned Imam’s decision not to bat.

Gupta focused on Pakistan’s difficult position in the Test. He also pointed to other players who continued playing despite serious injuries because their teams needed them.

Gupta said Imam may have wanted to show that he was genuinely injured. However, he still questioned why Imam came out in shorts with his calf taped.

On the Sports Tak YouTube Channel, Gupta spoke about several Test players who played despite serious physical problems.

He also compared Imam’s situation with Rishabh Pant and Chris Woakes.

Pant recently returned to bat after suffering a wrist injury during India’s Test against Sri Lanka. He scored 63 runs. India later kept him away from wicketkeeping as a precaution.

Woakes gave another strong example at The Oval in 2025. He suffered a serious shoulder injury but still came out to bat on the final morning. England needed 17 runs.

Woakes did not face a ball. However, he ran four runs before England were bowled out.

ALSO READ: “There Isn’t Much Time Left”: Lionel Messi Announces International Retirement

Test Cricket Has Seen Many Players Fight Through Injuries

Test cricket has a long history of players playing through serious injuries for their teams.

Anil Kumble famously bowled with a fractured jaw against West Indies in 2002. He bowled 14 overs and dismissed Brian Lara despite the injury.

Tamim Iqbal gave another incredible example in the 2018 Asia Cup. He suffered a fractured wrist against Sri Lanka. However, he returned to bat with one hand when Bangladesh had lost nine wickets.

Graeme Smith also played through pain several times. He once batted with an injured elbow and scored 108 against Australia in Perth.

Shamar Joseph produced another famous example at the Gabba in 2024. He suffered a painful toe injury after facing a yorker from Mitchell Starc.

Joseph still returned to bowl. He took 7/68 and helped West Indies beat Australia by eight runs.

These examples do not mean every injured player must play.

Some injuries can make batting or fielding impossible. Players also need to follow medical advice.

However, these examples explain why Imam’s body language and public practice session received so much attention.

ALSO READ: Impact Player rule back in focus as BCCI seeks franchises’ feedback ahead of IPL 2027

Pakistan’s Bigger Problem

The controversy around Imam is only one part of Pakistan’s problems.

Pakistan was already under pressure after losing the first Test. They then suffered another heavy defeat at Lord’s.

Their batting struggled during the series. The team has now made major changes ahead of the third Test.

When a team is struggling, questions about fitness, commitment and fighting spirit become even bigger.

Imam may genuinely have been unable to bat. But Broad’s criticism, Wasim’s earlier allegations and Gupta’s comments have started a wider debate about commitment in Pakistan cricket.

The main question is simple: should an injured player protect himself from making the injury worse, or should he take more risks when his team badly needs him?

There may not be a simple answer.

But Imam’s decision has certainly become another major talking point for Pakistan cricket.

What do you think? Was Imam ul Haq right? Or was he doing it just for the camera? Let us know your thoughts. 

Keep following Sportschilly for the latest updates.